Tweet
I leveled an enchanter to 49 with the idea of doing JC with her. But I also have a 65 shaman with 191 JC already (from 8th shawl). I'm sure I'll eventually level the enchanter but it'll be a long time before I even think about getting JCM. Is it worth it to start over just so I have that route available to me?
-
-
My thought is that JCM is very much worth getting for JC, specially for high end JC like PoP combines. I would always use the enchanters for combines in JC from now on although 2 of my characters are GM in JC.
Taushar
Carpe Diem, Carpe Nocturn
Taushar Tigris
High Elf Exemplar of 85th circle
Druzzil Ro server
Necshar Tigris
Gnome Necromancer of 32nd circle
Krugan
Barbarian Rogue of 61st circle
Katshar
Vah Shir Shaman of 26th circle
-
Considering you'll need to use the enchanter for enchanting metals and the like anyway, might as well use the enchanter, if you don't mind spending the cash to get the enchanter up to where the shaman is already.It's up to you, what you do will decide your own fate.
Make your choice now, for tomorrow may be far too late. -- Twisted SisterComment
-
shared bank. how anoying is it for you to use? that will answer your question. spend a lot more on later steps than you did getting their as well.
Maker of Picnics.
Cooker of things best left unidentified.
"Grimrose points to the sky. Look! Up in the sky, it's a bird, no, a plane, no it's Picnic-Man. It's Emiamn, a mild mannered tradeskiller by day but daring handsome crime fighter at night. Spreading peace and joy to norrath with his mighty Picnics!"Comment
-
Enchanters
Enchanters by far are the best for JC just cause of the AA. Before the AA, just about any class was good. My druid is 250 and has the trophy, BUT I have yet to try a single PoP combine just because of the AA.
:hatComment
-
I would go with the enchanter. It's much more convient. Getting to 191 with the enchanter shouldn't take too long.Comment
Comment