Originally posted by sp000n
As an enchanter I can say that there is one other advantage, CHA. Well, it is not as big of an advantage as it was before the 25 CHA mugs.
I have been slowly leveling up for years, and waaay back when I was burning money on JC whenever I could, I found my high CHA to be the only thing that let me keep going at times.
On another note, the Auricula mentioned the JC AA.
As a GM JC Ench, I feel irritated at, embarrassed by and bulled by that AA!
Irritated that someone at SOE decided to make it official, Ench are supposed to JCers, and not anyone else.
embarrassed at the prospects of what it will do to my skill.
Bullied by the fact that as a nonAA GM JCer, I am not even second rate when it comes to making the new, high end JC items. I am just not good enough to be considered when people want something made! My fail rate on Gem Studded chains is twice what an AAer's is, which adds to a ton of cash, so on and so forth.
I feel the JC AA was a terrible idea. Not everyone agrees with me, and that is fine. I know it has been gone over many times before.
A more generic trade skill AA would have been MUCH better.
That is my opinion on the JC AA that eventually will be available to me.
But does any of this make me a better choice for trades? Not really.
I think the best choices, in no particular order, would be a Halfing Druid or Ranger for Haversacks and Forage, Gnome Enchanter for vials, tinkering and int, Gnome Rogue for largest number of possible skills and dex to work well with most of them while still having OK int, or Iksar Shaman for 50 forage, Alchemy, and good wis to work with.
Each of those characters has pros and cons.
All are based off the unified trader principal, which is not for everyone.
That is my 2 CP worth.
Now come buy my mana vials! /tease



Comment