If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It may be choking on the cariage returns you have in your sig. Not at the end, but within the sig.
Ngreth Thergn
Ngreth nice Ogre. Ngreth not eat you. Well.... Ngreth not eat you if you still wiggle!
Grandmaster Smith 250
Master Tailor 200
Ogres not dumb - we not lose entire city to froggies
And my philosophy is that sig tests clutter the board with otherwise empty posts. Kindly use the Preview option to see how your post will render before hitting Submit.
Thankee!
No matter how subtle the wizard, a dagger between his shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.
i'm glad to see that the bbcode here allows for lists.. this si good.. and i guess html is allowed as well.. as long as no one abuses that.. what I would like to see, is bbcode for tables.. then you can pretty much disable the html altogeather if need be..
Ngreth nice Ogre. Ngreth not eat you. Well.... Ngreth not eat you if you still wiggle!
Grandmaster Smith 250
Master Tailor 200
Ogres not dumb - we not lose entire city to froggies
Is this supposed to be something a bit ... er, different?
And just curious - I see sigs like this:
[---]
_________________
Mdaisy Shadowbladde
56 Druid on Brell
Trade skills
Baking 157
Brewing 146
Fishing 137
Fletching 146
Jewelry 109
Pottery 131
Smithing 187
Tailoring 185
[---]
numerous places. The amount of acrage they eat up just can get annoying. Are these supposed to look "different" as well?
I don't mean this as an attack against either of you. Just a bit of curiousity on my part, using you as examples With the discovery process of adapting to these boards, I figure its a decient time to pose such questions.
I imagine it's the same problem folks ran into on EzBoard, that is that Netscape doesn't handle /select well unless it's part of a /form. Explorer was more forgiving about this which allowed for the drop down menu to work properly ... provided you weren't trying to view it with Netscape.
Netscape 6? wow ... every time I'd been trying to do web pages, I found NS6 to be the *least* forgiving browser. Netscape 4 would crash randomly, IE would have odd colors ... but NS6 just would go wacko unless the tags were all perfect. Interesting to here that at least somewhere it's flexible ...
I figured out the problem -
All the posts I looked at were short, so the message was just the minimum width, which includes some space below my avatar.
Comment