If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Once again:
Stats are <b>NOT</b> important for success rate
Nobody said they were?
I list my main stat out of habit, it's better to list your stat and not need it than to not list your stat when it is needed, to completely garble someone elses quote about guns
Prior to the last patch, my human smith (250) had a run of something like 3/28 on heraldic. Not including 1/4 on tae ew shields. A few days ago I got up the gumption to try some more and went 6/11, so my personal curse is gone.
Each time someone lists their stats in a post regarding their success rate, they continue to perpetuate the myth that stats somehow affect success rate. I bound and gagged a guildee, and proceeded to toss them into the deepest lava pit I could find, because they stated that falsehood in guild chat <img src=http://www.boomspeed.com/sinuuyanea/feliciachaorazz.gif alt="She really did! Just think about what she'd do to YOU!">
I am at 250 skill (unadjusted) and was stunned by my failure rate this weekend. I had the worst run I have ever had. Out of 12 attempts, I failed 5 BPs, 2 arms, 1 boots, 1 bracer. Prior to that I was easily 60%.
This morning I went 0/3 on Fierce Heraldic Breast Plates and 1/2 on Fine Heraldic Bracers.
I then went to Shadowhaven and went 1/1 on Tae Ew Chain Tunic and 3/3 on Tae Ew Shields.
The RNG is a harsh mistress. :roll:
Out of people that posted they were 250 smiths, and done their combines since the most recent patch we are a combined 8 successes for 54 attempts. Those with under, and well under in some cases, seem to be experiencing far less failures. Fall, can you post whenyou did that 6 for 11 run?
At lunch I did another set of 22 combines. Made 9 items. While that is under 50%, it isn't THAT much under 50%. At the start, tho, I was 2 for 9 and was very VERY angry...;-)
Comment