Currently it makes very little sense to use a Solo or Duo mount.
So a proposal:
Solo: Has type 7, 9 and 11 aug slots. The type 11 aug boosts the stats to 120% of current.
Duo: Has a type 9, and two type 11 aug slots. Each type 11 aug is at 70% of current stats.
Trio: Has 10, 10, 11 slots.
Assuming the remove the "can't have the same gem twice", using Taafy, and a 20 AC 60 HP/mana/end aug (a very good aug!) in the type 7, we get:
Solo: Type 9 + 43 AC 360 HP/mana/end 28 all resists
Duo: Type 9 + 29 AC 350 HP/mana/end 32 all resists
Trio: 19 AC 450 HP 250 mana/end 23 all resists (with 2 type 10 opals)
Ie, all 3 are interesting. Solo requires a good type 7: if you have a good type 7, a Solo setting is tempting. Duo requires two of the good type 11 gems to have good stats, which makes it annoying. And Trio is what we have right now.
...
I just want to talk about it, and see if there are any abuses with proposing something like the above.
So a proposal:
Solo: Has type 7, 9 and 11 aug slots. The type 11 aug boosts the stats to 120% of current.
Duo: Has a type 9, and two type 11 aug slots. Each type 11 aug is at 70% of current stats.
Trio: Has 10, 10, 11 slots.
Assuming the remove the "can't have the same gem twice", using Taafy, and a 20 AC 60 HP/mana/end aug (a very good aug!) in the type 7, we get:
Solo: Type 9 + 43 AC 360 HP/mana/end 28 all resists
Duo: Type 9 + 29 AC 350 HP/mana/end 32 all resists
Trio: 19 AC 450 HP 250 mana/end 23 all resists (with 2 type 10 opals)
Ie, all 3 are interesting. Solo requires a good type 7: if you have a good type 7, a Solo setting is tempting. Duo requires two of the good type 11 gems to have good stats, which makes it annoying. And Trio is what we have right now.
...
I just want to talk about it, and see if there are any abuses with proposing something like the above.
Comment