Tweet
You knew it was only a matter of time...so how about some tradeskill-made tradeable cards?
-
Squeaky Toy300 Smithing 7/7 - 300 Tailoring 7/7 - 300 Jewelcraft 7/7 - 300 Tinkering 7/7 - 300 Pottery 7/7 - 300 Research 7/7 - 300 Baking 7/7 - 300 Brewing 7/7 - 300 Fletching 7/7The Meanest Tradeskiller on Cazic Thule -
Or even better, purging that game from EQ.Roanne LeFaye
Warrior Barbarian of the Tribunal
Outsider Domination
The Seventh Hammer
2100 Club + 300 melee Research -
You want a tradeskillable way to purge LoN from EQ? Hmm... /evil grin
Humor aside, I think it's pretty clear that LoN isn't going anywhere. For those opposed to it, it's no worse than having Gems in EQ, and in fact, it's better -- if you get a booster pack drop (of no value to you if you don't play LoN), you can sell it to a player who does play LoN for oodles of cash.
That aside, I think it would be neat to have some cards that are unique to each game (EQ1/EQ2), and can only be made using that game's tradeskills. Once the cards are "imported" into LoN, they can be traded or used in decks like normal cards. Still, they take a little more effort to acquire than typical CCG cards, which gives them a nice collectibility and flavor.Sir KyrosKrane Sylvanblade
Master Artisan (300 + GM Trophy in all) of Luclin (Veeshan)
Master Fisherman (200) and possibly Drunk (2xx + 20%), not sober enough to tell!
Lightbringer, Redeemer, and Valiant servant of Erollisi MarrComment
-
But the nature of tradeskills makes those common, though rare drops could be required.
I am not sure at this time that they are into doing single cards, but I can ask.
Tradeskills will NOT be making packs.
Ngreth Thergn
Ngreth nice Ogre. Ngreth not eat you. Well.... Ngreth not eat you if you still wiggle!
Grandmaster Smith 250
Master Tailor 200
Ogres not dumb - we not lose entire city to froggies
Comment
-
Much different then gems.
I don't really get the concept of LoN. /shrugRawckett Launcher
79 Gnome Wizard of Sol Ro / Bristlebane
300 Tinkerer; 287 Jeweler; 258 Brewer; 240 Blacksmith; 237 Fletcher; 208 Potter; 204 Baker; 200 Fisherman; 193 Researcher; 183 TailorComment
-
Seems pretty clear to me: I gather that M:tG still has a large following, and there's probably a fair amount of cross-over between that group and online gamers. It is an attempt to either hold on to the card gamers already playing EQ, or to attract card gamers to the game.
For those like me that have no interest in those sorts of games, it is mostly just an annoyance to hear all the chatter about it. Plus money spent in game on cards is money not spent on stuff on my mule, presumably, though you could argue about pass-through.
Fudapuda
BertoxComment
Comment