non-enchanted Silver Jasper Ring

[Auricula]

this combine trivials at 30, but database has it listed as 28.

[Auricula]

another Bump

Did I mention how much fun I am having going thru stuff I squirreled away in the bank because I couldn't figure out what to do with it? Eight characters with a 10-slot container in every available bank space ... and I am only halfway through them.

[Krazick]

No need to bump the threads. They will be handled ...

The reason I have not done these two updates are a few:

1. I don't do a lot of JC stuff, so I don't verify many myself
2. The Trivials you are specifing as different have been set a LONG time ago... and these are the first contradictions I have seen.
3. I have seen JC updates generally being handled by another editor

Not that I don't believe you... it just seems odd that it would never have been challenged as wrong before now.

(Well with #1, My JC is up to 105, so my main is beyond that trivial level.)

[Auricula]

ahh .. the actual printout of jewelry combines I have from EQtraders was printed July 22, 2002 (LOL). It doesn't list any trivials, just the gems in order of increasing difficulty. So when I skilled up my first jeweler, I would have followed the suggested link to 'Gumkak's site' for information on trivials.

My handwritten notes on the trivials from back then cite the numbers I mentioned. My main jeweler is 250+ GM trophy, Auricula skilled up to 200 using that same handwritten trivial information a month ago, and last night I had a 3rd baby skill up to a whole level 40 just to double check the discrepency (well that, and to use up some crappy looted gems).

[Niami DenMother]

Tentatively changing this one and the other you reported. It's *possible* that the nonenchanted versions have a different trivial than the enchanted, and I am positive one (or 30) folks will be happy to tell me how wrong it is if they find a different number. ;D